TED, You're correct! I should have added ignore the cover sheet it will most likely suggest a new processor.
"" Fewer faster are better than more slower engines for many workloads "" -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: additional processor? >It's best to have IBM commission a Capacity Study. Having a vendor doing a Capacity Study is akin to: The Farmer yells into the henhouse: "How's it going"? The Fox yells back: "Send in more chickens"! >You can supply them with a peak usage week of SMF/RMF data usually at no cost. I've not seen it at no cost for years. The last one I was involved in/hired for cost my company $750K (US). And, as always, a capacity study (especially the first one) involves an upgrade (see above). - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This e-mail message and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of its authorized recipient(s). If you are not an intended or authorized recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the information contained in this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this message in error or are not authorized to receive it, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original message and all copies of it from your computer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
