There are a *lot* of RMF PTF's that must be in place for this to work, as well as microcode. Symptoms include differing displays of the artificial MSU ratings.
I would check to be sure I was *completely* up to date on both RMF and microcode. The end result is worth the effort, though. HTH and good luck. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Ball Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 10:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: SCRT Question Howdy, According to the JCL tailoring instructions, the only field that needs changed from the original JCL is the customer name/number but I've run a few test runs changing the 2nd PARM field to actually reflect the MSU's put in Defined Capacity as well as running the default (nothing in that field) and the numbers are -much- different if the actual D.C. and # of lpars is specified. So my question to the group is which way are you running your SCRT report? It appears if the actual MSU's are specified the billable MSU's are much less than when you use the default. Bill Mainframe - An obsolete device still used by thousands of obsolete companies, serving billions of obsolete customers, and making huge obsolete profits, for their obsolete shareholders. And this year's run twice fast as last year's. -Phil Payne- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
