On 7 Dec 2009 14:12:46 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >That's the entire question. Assume a programmer is good at both languages. >Also assume that the work to be done can be done in both languages without a >bunch of "funny" stuff. I wonder which would take less CPU, on average. If I >had a zAAP, I'd likely go with Java. If I needed to to ISPF macros, then REXX. >Or, even weirder comparison: intepreted REXX vs. compiled NetREXX (REXX >variant which compiles to Java .class file).
If NetREXX were to be used, could the resultant code legally (according to IBM terms and conditions) be run on a zIP or zAAP? would there be any benefit to doing so? > >John McKown >Systems Engineer IV >IT > >Administrative Services Group > >HealthMarkets(r) > >9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 >(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell >john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com > >Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or >proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact >the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. >HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the >insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance >Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The >MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
