DOMINGUEZ MARTIN, ANGEL LUIS wrote:
Only as a suggestion...... why not moving to logger/operlog and get rid off syslog?It was introduced ten years ago and in any moment IBM could force us to change.
That won't happen. There are a few Operlog "show stoppers" IBM would need to address before Syslog obsolescence could be entertained. I authored two SHARE requirements in this area that remain "Recognized". Even with those obstacles removed, it's hard to imagine IBM forcing such a drastic procedural change for so little gain. Removing Syslog won't solve any real problem or dramatically reduce development costs.
-- .-----------------------------------------------------------------. | Edward E. Jaffe | | | Mgr, Research & Development | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phoenix Software International | Tel: (310) 338-0400 x318 | | 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 | Fax: (310) 338-0801 | | Los Angeles, CA 90045 | http://www.phoenixsoftware.com | '-----------------------------------------------------------------' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
