Mike, I'm not planning the recovery. The thread has been opened by someone else, but I agree, that if you want to be safe with VTS data, you have to think about peer to peer vts. Exactly that I said in my first reply to the thread.
Franz Josef Pohlen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 3:44 PM Subject: Re: Disaster recovery question - 3952 drives in an ATL. > Franz, In a real disaster you cannot rely on getting ANY tapes, whether > logical or stacked from a VTS. Only data which you have exported or > copied to physical tapes at another site is available; I do hope you dont > plan on being able to step back inside the 3494 and pick up the important > stacked tapes and take them to the recovery site. > If you really have active tape data and need almost instant recovery you > should look to Peer to Peer VTS > > Mike Wood RMM Development > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:05:15 +0200, Pohlen Mailinglist <fjpohlen- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hi Mike, > > > >I know the DITTO function, but it cannot be used in case of disaster > >recovery, because you normally will not have an actual export tape of the > >vts when there is a disaster situation. In my opinion vts-export can only > be > >used for planned actions e. g. merging logical volumes from one vts to > >another. > > > >Franz Josef Pohlen > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
