> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Russell Witt
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 7:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Replace VTS with a tape less appliance
> 
> Bob,
> 
> 
> What you might want to think about instead would be the following.
> Instead
> of having CA-1 notify the robot in real-time that a tape has been
> changed to
> a SCRATCH tape; do it in batch. Take the output report from TMSCLEAN
> and put
> it to a (+1) GDG file. Then, on a daily basis take the (-5) GDG file
> as
> input to a batch-job that notifies the robot of the new scratch
> tapes. The
> result is that CA-1 will have scratched the tape (and possibly un-
> cataloged
> it) and reported it as scratch. But the robot is not notified for 5-
> days
> (assuming a once-a-day running of TMSCLEAN).
> 
> The only thing this will NOT catch are work-tapes (set WRKFLS to NO)
> and the
> ISPF "SCRATCH" command (easy enough to disable and/or block with
> security
> rules if you want to).
> 

Hi Russell,

   Thanks much for the clarification.  This might be what we need.

Bob Lester

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to