Do you have any OPEN's for DCBs using QSAM? That will acquire buffers, I think 
that they're in SP0. You need to do a FREEPOOL immediately after you CLOSE the 
DCB to release them.

--
John McKown 
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
[email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Deaver
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Getmain Freemain?
> 
>  ST    R5,SAVER5
>  GETMAIN EC,LV=(5),A=TABLADDR,SP=2
> 
> L     R5,SAVER5
> FREEMAIN R,LV=(5),A=TABLADDR,SP=2
> 
> SAVER5   DC    F'0'
> 
> So I think I have the form right, its not complaining about 
> the FREEMAIN
> being invalid anymore, but its also not working as I would expect it.
> Initially, it was complaining because I did not have a 
> subpool specified,
> and SP0 was being used, and my program can not free subpool 0 space.
> Watching the job execute in the landmark activity monitor, the storage
> being consumed is still from SP0 and the freemain is 
> obviously not doing
> what its suppose to.   I know I get to the statement, because 
> if I screw up
> the form, it complains when it is executed, but the storage 
> in SP0 keeps
> heading up.
> 
> So - any ideas why it isn't grabbing storage from SP2, and 
> why the FREEMAIN
> isn't working?  Mmmmm.....
> 
> On the flip side.   I was thinking there might be a way in 
> the REXX script
> that calls this thing in a loop to 'reset' itself each time - 
> like its a
> step end, but not really since I can't lose the other REXX 
> variables I'm
> using in there.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
> Systems Engineering
> [email protected]
> 651-665-4231(v)
> IS - "Creating competitive advantage with technology.  
> Providing service
> that excels."
> OSS - " Where Innovation Happens"
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to