On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:56:15 +0000, Eric Bielefeld wrote: >Thanks Allan. That pretty much confirms what I thought, that the paging was >distributed equally among all of the page datasets. We had 3 local page >datasets. One of them is significantly smaller than the other 2, which is the >one that went over 80%. This is a tech support sandbox system with no real >work on it. Thanks for the info. > Wouldn't it make more sense if "distributed equally" were defined as a percentage of available space rather than number of pages? (Yes, I know that for disparate data set sizes this would distribute the I/Os less uniformly, but it would delay the ultimate disaster.)
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
