This is one of the many BPXBAT* problems that is solved by the free Co:Z Batch utility.
See: http://dovetail.com/products/cozbatch.html Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Mark Steely <[email protected]> wrote: > We have several batch jobs that spawn (forked) additional address spaces > with a number append to the jobname. These jobs execute BPXBATCH or > BPXBATSL. Is there a way to have these jobs use the current job address > space instead of starting a new one? > > Thank You > > > > > > > > > > ******* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ******* > > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may > contain legally privileged and confidential information intended > solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message > is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this > message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender > immediately and delete this message from your system. Thank you. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
