> > From: [email protected] > > Does this mean ISPF is already perfect? Or perhaps no-one is > > using it anymore? ;-)
> From: [email protected] > Maybe it means that IBM wishes every ISPF (development) shop to use WDz. > Which is more profitable to IBM. <cynicism/> Hmmm, I wonder which is more profitable for IBM; a single IPT/Spiffy license that covers everyone who works on the mainframe, or individual WDz licenses for those who work on the PC? Either way I guess it makes sense to stop enhancing regular ISPF in order to encourage customers to choose either IPT or WDz. Of course, it might also encourage customers to choose third party options... ;-) Dave Salt SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it! http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html _________________________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
