In a message dated 10/18/2005 8:59:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>ISTR that Hasp used various "interleave" factors to write logical  
>blocks 1,2,3  et cetera as physical blocks 1,3,5.. or 1,4,7.. so  that 
>in the time that it took to traverse the intervening trackspace  the 
>Problem Program (such an appropriate term) had the opportunity to  
>generate another block of output lines.
Yes.  And the interleaving factor was a user-changeable parameter  (HASP 
Installation Parameter).  I think it defaulted to 1, which meant  one DASD 
block 
would be skipped when sequentially moving through the SYSOUT  data belonging to 
one file.  E.g., if there were five blocks per track,  then they were 
formatted with record numbers in the count fields of 1, 4, 2,  5, 3.  The idea 
was to 
allow for extra DASD latency time to overlap the  time it took either for the 
application program to generate the next block of  SYSOUT or else for the 
HASP Print/Punch code to deblock all the logical  records in one block and send 
those logical records to either a real local or  remote printer or punch (or 
other unit record device, such as a  plotter).  Two things wrong with this idea 
were that (1) all SPOOL  volumes would be formatted the same, and thus some 
application programs might  generate SYSOUT at rates that did not match the 
latency, and (2) there were no  high-speed DASD back-up and restore utilities 
available that could handle  non-isotonically increasing DASD record numbers.
 
>Today, while waiting on the 'phone for a customer to check a  library 
>for something, I filled and switched the electric kettle on,  
>interleaving two tasks, using the latencies in each to do something  
>useful in the other.  Women, generally, are better trained at  this 
>multitasking, IMO  :-) .
I disagree.  I think most men and women are equally capable of  
multi-tasking.  But I think most women are more easily distracted by  task(N+1) 
while 
multitasking on tasks(N-1 and N) and then they forget  about tasks (N-1 and N). 
 
Just my opinion.
 
Bill Fairchild



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to