> Only if you're not authorized. (No good reason.) I really want to run non-authorized because it vastly lowers customer resistance to product trials.
> Why do you think IDENTIFY (with LOAD) has lower overhead? Just a guess. No good reason. Perhaps it's not. I don't know -- that's why I have been asking here. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 8:28 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Best practice for 24-bit storage in assembler called from C/C++ On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:10:55 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >IDENTIFY is an interesting idea. I would suspect lower overhead than >name/token. But can you IDENTIFY an address in GETMAIN storage? Doesn't it >have to be inside a "real" load module? > Only if you're not authorized. (No good reason.) Or, LOAD a REUS,NORENT,NOREFR CSECT and use that for the anchor. REUS causes subsequent calls to return the samd address. Calls after the first should DELETE it, just to keep the reference count from overflowing. Programmers used to do lots of things such as this before name/token became available. Why do you think IDENTIFY (with LOAD) has lower overhead? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
