In <01bb01cab42e$08768200$196386...@org>, on 02/22/2010
at 06:15 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> said:
>Perhaps someone else has a better justification or a better resolution?
Is there some reason to rule out the obvious justification: holding down
the size of the assembly listing? Of course, that only applies to COPY
code; for macros, they could have used PRINT NOGEN.
I make it a habit to assemble my code with SYSTERM output.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
