>These would presumably be the same beancounters who decided that after almost >50 years, it would make sense to start charging hefty subsciption fees for >IBM's research journals last year. That was another "stupid, stupid idea", but >it hasn't been reversed, despite plenty of complaining here and elsewhere..
Why is everybody assuming the dropping of RedBooks is true. Why are we wasting our time. So far, we have hearsay from a couple of non-IBM'rs, and an IBM'r saying it isn't so, joe. Why waste the bandwidth on unsubstantiated chatter? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
