You got me on the push-pull bit :-) That is pretty much what I plan to do by giving the new VTS a different range of addresses but I need to migrate all the existing data over (HSM, etc.) so I would have problems with UNIT=TAPE as I would not be able to determine into which VTS the data is being written into. We need to run with them both concurrently for a short period of time.
Thanks, Seb. On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:56:12 -0500, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]> wrote: >I guess that will depend. > >Are you doing a push-pull? So only one Tape Type will be active at one >time? > >Are your ACS routines reviewed? > >I did not change my esoteric name, only the device addresses defined to that >esoteric when I moved from STK to VTS. So "TAPE" had B00-B25 in it and I >had removed the Af0-Aff. But it was always TAPE. > >Lizette > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
