On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:41:36 +0000, Bob Shannon <[email protected]> wrote:
>We applied the APAR. We protect the SMP data. I'm sort of baffled why IBM felt SAF support was necessary for SMPE. > >Since we are a development shop in which dozens of people use SMPE, we simply set the access to UACC(READ) which gives everyone access to all of the SMP/E commands. > It's not necessary, but I can "stretch" and see the case where a shop might want to let an ID or group have RECEIVE authority for example, but not let them to do an APPLY or not let them perform admin functions. Perhaps a production userid that does RECEIVE ORDER via a job scheduler on a nightly or weekly basis. For query only, the CSI can simply be protected from update via RACF data set profiles. I'd be mildly curious to know where the requirement came from. Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
