As somebody who lost their job due to out-sourcing (twice), I agree.
Stop putzing and show compassion!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Hollander on DesertWiz <[email protected]>
Date:         Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:09:02 
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: (slightly OT) CA is laying off 1,000 workers and expects to take a 
$50m hit in pre-tax charges relating to the jobs cull

I think many of you are lacking sensitivity for a very tough situation.  I
lost
many colleagues and friends this week, who were excellent technicians and
who really
worked in the trenches as many of us on the list do.  If you want to rant
about CA products
and solutions, the support you may or may not be getting, or the quality of
acquired
companies; by all means, go ahead.  It is an open forum.  But many of these
folks have
distinguished careers, families to support, and definitely don't need to
hear anyone's
opinion on their value.  And if you want to hide behind anonymous fictitious
names, also go
ahead; we already think less of you.  Sorry for the rant to those who don't
deserve it.

Have a good weekend. 

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Scott Barry
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 5:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: (slightly OT) CA is laying off 1,000 workers and expects to
take a $50m hit in pre-tax charges relating to the jobs cull

On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:50:35 -0700, zMan <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Ed Gould <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2010/04/06/ca_job_cuts/
>>
>
>No disrespect to the many actual CA workers, but having served my own
>sentence there, I'm quite confident that they could lay off 1,000 bodies
>without selecting any *workers*.
>

So what's your point?  And it's clear in your first sentence that some level
of personal opinion on the off-topic concern was intended, and yes, I expect
there are CA workers on this forum that have been disrespected.

Scott Barry
SBBWorks, Inc.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to