On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:45:37 -0500 "McKown, John"
<[email protected]> wrote:

:>I'm curious about if I just wanted to do the equivalent of a START for an 
STC, is there any reason to use ASCRE versus MGCRE? Are there some advanced 
options or features to ASCRE that make it worth while to use? Any example? From 
reading, it seems that it may be easier to set up a cross memory environment 
between the starting and started address spaces using ASCRE.

:>What I'm considering this for is an STC which listens on a TCPIP port, 
accept()s the connection (to a socket), then uses ASCRE or MGCRE to start up an 
STC to actually do the functions needed by the client. I know that it would 
likely be easier to do a fork(), at least in regards to passing the socket to 
the child, but I don't know that I actually want to use UNIX services.

As you are using a full function address space, there is not that much of an
advantage to using ASCRE. Do whichever is easier.

--
Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to