In a recent note, Bob Shannon said: > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 07:11:00 -0400 > > Has IBM responded to your requirements? Oh, you haven't written > requirements? > > My mistake. > Mmmm. Good point. But my needs here would readily be satisfied by concurrent TSO/ISPF sessions and scripting in the terminal emulator; most of my nattering and thrashing has been in search of an alternative; a fallback position.
And I assumed from the recurrent chatter that concurrent TSO/ISPF sessions is a recognized requirement. But that's jumping to a conclusion. So, what's the truth? Has anyone written a requirement for concurrent session support? (And has IBM responded to it?) -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
