On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:45:26 -0500, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DeFabritus, Peter >> [NCSUS Non-J&J] >> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:41 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: DFSMSdfp ACS routine question. >> > ><snip> > >> >> The trick I have used in the past is to assign a different >> sysplex name in >> the LOADxx parameter tailored for DR, then reference the >> &SYSPLEX variable >> in the ACS routines to control the logic path. >> > >Wouldn't that mess up my couple datasets? Or do rebuild them at DR? We >just use our dumped ones. > >-- >John McKown >Senior Systems Programmer >UICI Insurance Center >Information Technology > >This message (including any attachments) contains confidential >information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its' >content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you >should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, >copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action >based on it, is strictly prohibited. > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html We had a separate set of preformatted couple data sets for DR, and the DR LOADxx member caused a special COUPLExx pointing to these data sets to be used, so that nothing needed to be done at the DR site. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
