On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:01:46 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote: >Concur, however, there are a different set of ISPMLIB, ISPSLIB,... >(usually included in the TSO concat for those files) that are still >required to be present. > And I mostly disagree with that, although I can't dispute the OP's observation. I have a demo SDSF EXEC that runs under z/OS Unix with _no_ such allocations. I know I cribbed it from somewhere with considerable modifications -- I didn't write it ab ovo, but I neglected to keep the attribution.
I'll send it off-list to anyone who's curious and sends me a request off-list. I'd be grateful to anyone who can point me to the example I cribbed. ><snip> >ADDRESS SDSF does not require ISPF. >The old SDSF access routines do need ISPF, but the interface that came >with 1.9 does not. ></snip> -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
