George Henke pisze:
Would someone please tell me what is "best practices" as to where most of
the User Acceptance Testing (UAT) should take place?
1) In the developers' Integration Testing environment and conducted by
developers
2) In the Quality Assuarnce (QA) environment and conducted by QA analysts
Also where should final user signoff occur?
The best place is production - there you have all the data. The best
team to do it is Development team - they know better how to use it; this
is also the reason why no technical documentation is needed. There
should be no separate QA environment and separate team. <g>
Funny ? I heard some of the statements above. Spoken seriously.
OK, IMHO UAT should be conducted *before* QA. The environmnet could be
the same as UAT, but it could lead to bottlenecks - one team waits for
another.
IMHO it shouldn't be Integration Testing env. because of bottlenecks
too, even stronger.
Obviously UATs are done by the users, but watch details - who is a user
of batch? Who's responsible for checking performance?
YMMV
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego,
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2009 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci
wpacony) wynosi 118.763.528 zotych. W zwizku z realizacj warunkowego
podwyszenia kapitau zakadowego, na podstawie uchway XXI WZ z dnia 16 marca
2008r., oraz uchway XVI NWZ z dnia 27 padziernika 2008r., moe ulec
podwyszeniu do kwoty 123.763.528 z. Akcje w podwyszonym kapitale zakadowym
BRE Banku SA bd w caoci opacone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
