On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:32:48 -0500, Gary Loebach <gary.loeb...@ca.com> 
wrote:

>I think there are a lot of components involved here all trying to start up at 
IPL.
>There is VTAM, TCPIP(Telnet), CICS, and the emulator on the PC. I would
>think it is just a timing problem in that all the components needing to be 
active
>to autolog are just not ready yet. I suspect Telnet is opening ACBs for each 
of
>the simulated 3270 devices and when CICS starts, VTAM is doing autolog for
>those simulated devices that haven't had their ACBs opened yet. Which is
>probably producing the error you see. I suspect the ACB openings are a bit
>serialized in a few task in Telnet, so given that some of the ACB may be open
>and some not yet while autolog is kicking off. You say if you bounce the CICS
>region everything comes up,  would support this theory since at that point
>Telnet is completely up. If this is what is happening then for IPL we would
>need to delay the start of the CICS regions until Telnet gets fully initialized
>and then I think all those session would come up.
>

We may have a winner here...

I went through and lined up the various pieces that I've discovered so far...
10171 21:18:24.44 SYSLOG   00000000  IEE042I SYSTEM LOG DATA SET 
INITIALIZED

10171 21:18:30.79 STC03994 00000080  IST093I APTCP ACTIVE

10171 21:20:35.66 STC04089 00000084  $HASP373 TESTTRN  STARTED

10171 21:20:35.63 STC04088 00000084  $HASP373 TESTOLD  STARTED

10171 21:21:24.56 STC04120 00000000  IEF403I TN3270D - STARTED

10171 21:22:38.42 STC03994 00000084  IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST 
FAILED, PCOPO3

10171 21:22:38.42 STC03994 00000084  IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST 
FAILED, PCOPO4

10171 21:22:39.72 STC03994 00000084  IST663I INIT OTHER REQUEST 
FAILED, PCOPO6

   While the production CICS's actually start earlier, they are much larger and 
take a longer to initialize. Maybe that's what allows them to connect up OK 
while the test terminals consistently don't ??? TN3270 seems to be ready 
about a second prior to the terminals being accessed, so this might not be the 
cause. It's close enough to give it a shot though.

   In any event, I moved the TN3270 start up prior to the CICS start ups. 
That should give it enough time to complete initialization prior to CICS 
looking 
for them.

   But VTAM is activating them prior to that. Is this the proper sequence ??? 
VTAM --> TN3270 --> Applications ??? It seems logical to me, but this whole 
quest has been an experience...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to