Shouldn't any competent auditor who is asking about a vendor's programs know that they have to ask the vendor, not the user? Shouldn't your only response have to be "Ask IBM"?
Oops. Is "competent auditor" an oxymoron? Peter -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Module description I don't know how many releases ago, but, IBM published a manual called Module Descriptions. The manual contained concise information about modules and some of the attributes. Does IBM have anything similar now? We are going through a security audit and Sarbannes-Oxley compliance. I keep getting questions about obscure modules and their functions. I usually search IBMLink for APARs that describe the module. It sure would be nice if IBM had a central place, manual or Web page, that contained this information. _ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
