>Sorry, not trying to pick nits, but you said it was a SUPERSET of Script. >It's not. >That's like saying z/OS is a superset of assembler because (most of) it's >written in assembler.
No, GML is a superset of script, by definition. A superset includes all the functions/elements of the original set, PLUS new elements that do not exist in the original set. This is the TRUE definition of a superset. If you do not preprocess all the macroes/tags before you actually process the document they won't work. But, the script commands will. >That's like saying z/OS is a superset of assembler because (most of) it's >written in assembler. No it's not. You've put words in my mouth, I did not say anything of the sort. By definition (of superset)assembler with macroes is a superset of assembler. And, that is where the 'analogy' stops. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! SHAZAM! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
