Ruegsegger, Jeff wrote: >We have been using the standard SMF switch/dump method utilizing IEFu29 for years. Recently on one of out severly systems, IEFU29 is not getting control after our midnight switch of SMF recording.
Do you do the switch on all LPARS simultaneously on midnight? My (bad) experience is that you should do 'I SMF' one or two LPAR(s) in a sysplex at a time. What is running on that LPAR during midnight? >We issue "I MVS" at around midnight followed by our daily SMF accumulation process. We also switch our JES2 SYSLOG at this time. Interestingly I moved the "I SMF" command just a few minutes later and U29 seems to get control just fine. What is 'I MVS' command? You mean perhaps 'I SMF'? Perhaps that exit does something? Submitting a job or issueing a WTO? >I'ts my understanding that IEFU29 runs as part of the SMF address space so I assume that I'm off base assuming that the WRITELOG we issue for the SYSLOG at the same time is affecting IEFU29....however moving the time by just a few minutes after the WRITELOG seems to have solved the issue. Has anyone else come accross this before? IEFU29 is indeed part of SMF address space as documented. I have no more comments, but who issued the WRITELOG and 'I SMF' commands? > Any notions about why IEFU29 is not invoking as expected? What is your exit doing? Do you have the source code? Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
