Kirk, we do not have any influence on the "quality" of our programmers. John tested the sample code and at average, Java is slower and consume more CPU then Cobol (I believe). What I am trying to get is if EGL customers have any reason to select to generate Java over Cobol.
Do they? What about using zAAP? it will not speed up or consume less cpu then a CP, the only advantage over CP is that it is not counted in CPU usage reports (YET). ITschak On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Itschak Mugzach <[email protected]> > wrote: > > And Kirk, you are THE java technolgy here. Protect your case... > > > > OK, how about this: > > If your are deciding whether to use COBOL or Java based on asking this > question, use COBOL :-) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
