On 1 Nov 2005 09:57:53 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John) wrote:

Reminds me of an actual request from an auditor many years ago:

<quote>
List all possible exits in every piece of software installed on your MVS system. Futher detail everything that could be done by using those
exits.
</quote>

On 1 Nov 2005 09:53:16 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Farley, Peter x23353) wrote:

Shouldn't any competent auditor who is asking about a vendor's programs know that they have to ask the vendor, not the user? Shouldn't your only
response have to be "Ask IBM"?

On 2 Nov 2005 13:30:51 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Yuhas) wrote:

I do not have the luxury of saying 'Because, IBM did it that way'. I have to explain or we get another mark against us in the audit report.

     And I once had an auditor ask me, "What is RACF?".

A good auditor (whether internal or external) helps us by finding potential security flaws that we missed. The auditors we're discussing here merely justify their existence by giving black marks. Unfortunately, some management and some clients look only at the auditor reports, but not at what they really mean.

Is there an organization that rates security auditors? If not, is it time to create one?

We can tell management that the auditors are asking silly questions and that the reports they're creating are basically bogus [1], but it does no good; the report came from an auditor so it must mean something (Garbage In, Gospel Out). If there were a rating org for auditors, we could report this silliness to them, and, eventually, show that audit reports from company X are not reliable. It should lead to better auditing (and therefore better security), in the long run.

===
[1] "bogus" as used in USA and hackerdom (see the Jargon File). I know that in England the word means something different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to