JES2 exits (if you want to write / support them) can also help do this
without having to change JCL.   Of course there are products like
MVS Solutions ThruPut Manager that have a CLIST like language
to do the same sort of control (with vendor supported JES2 exits
behind the scenes doing the work).   $$$ and overkill for what you 
are asking, but I thought I would mention it.   

Do you have to share spool?  It shouldn't affect your sysplex pricing
or whatever other discount you are getting.    You could always
NJE jobs over if you need to or scheduling packages can submit
the job on the desired host.   Depending on what the LPAR is
used this could be the best option.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS       
mailto:[email protected]                                          
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/




On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:42:42 -0500, Field, Alan C.
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Some ideas:
>1 - Set up SCHEDULING ENVIRONMENTS in WLM and use that to steer the jobs
>to the appropriate LPARs
>
>2 - Set up initiators so that only certain classes are defined on PRD3
>and 4
>This presumes you aren't using all 36 classes already and could define
>some uniquely to PRD3/4.
>
>3 - Use /*JOBPARM SYSAFF=PRD3 to ensure the jobs run only on the
>designated LPAR
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
>Behalf Of SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Ivan A. Ramos
>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 15:35
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: JES2 MAS member restriction
>
>We have two LPARs (PRD1,PRD2) on a MAS, but have included 2 more
>(PRD3,PRD4). Due to a special IBM pricing, we only wants that certain
>workload could run on the new ones. We have WLM and IRD working on our
>systems.
>
>Basically we would like to segment or restrict JOBs (Batch or TSO) from
>running where they are not suppose to. They should be balanced among the
>old
>lpars, but not able to run on the new ones and viceversa.
>
>Any idea on how to accomplish this? Any inputs would be really
>appreciated.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to