On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 19:32:27 +0200, Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I thought with LLA hashing, that if there are identical names in different >linklist libraries that it was unpredictable which one would be used. > I've never heard that before and I don't see how it can be true. I've been at too many shops with "junk libraries" containing old modules at or near the bottom of the LNKLST and the LNKLST is automatically controlled by LLA. I've also fixed problems via dynamic LNKLST addition by putting a new library ahead of another library that contained identically named modules. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America and Farmers Insurance Group mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html "Programming is like sex. One mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life." - Michael Sinz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
