On 5 Sep 2010 14:17:23 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>On 09/05/2010 02:25 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
>> Rick Fochtman wrote:
>>> I'll give you another oxymoron: journalistic integrity
>>> Today, it's becoming rarer and rarer and I suspect will die out completely 
>>> in our lifetimes.  :-(
>> 
>> Now, now. Lumping all journalists in one boat is as unfair as putting all 
>> computers into the same category.
>> 
>> Some of us go to a fair amount of trouble to verify everything we write 
>> about.
>> 
>> Having said that, I'll agree that *every* mainstream news story of which 
>> I've ever had first-hand knowledge got several significant and important 
>> facts wrong, such as names, ages, and confusing an employment address with a 
>> home address. Whether that's incompetence or just the rush to publish is 
>> unclear. None of them were malicious -- none of them improved (or hurt) the 
>> story for anyone who didn't already know those facts -- but it does speak to 
>> a certain lack of verification.
>> 
>> ...phsiii 
>> 
>
>I suspect the original sentiment was prompted by so many on cable "news"
>and talk shows that like to classify themselves as "journalists" when
>all they do is report the latest rumour without analysis as to validity,
>or referee opposing speakers as if all sides of an argument have equal
>validity. Not that infrequently these days, one side of an argument is
>just flat-out wrong and should be reported that way.
>
>A real journalist would not allow a guest speaker to build an argument
>from "facts" that are really falsehoods (lies) without immediately
>calling him to task - but that of course requires the journalist to have
>done his homework and know more than the person being interviewed - a
>rare quality now days.  People who are notorious for promoting
>demonstrable falsehoods should not be given free air time merely for the
>entertainment value, because there are unfortunately at least 20% of the
>population that will believe anything they hear on the air, no matter
>how ridiculous.

As someone who was in a field where you can't get a consensus on
whether JES2 is better than JES3 and who is a follower of
transportation issues (and a member of Transport Action Atlantic), I
doubt a reporter would be able to determine easily which side of an
argument is flat out wrong, even with some hours of research.

Clark Morris 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to