Yifat,

Without any other specification, such as BUFSP at define or BFND on the
REPRO, IDCAMS without SMB used to default to BUFND of two, and only read one
CI at a time.

Are you saying the default changed, or changed for Extended Format?

I suggested it would not make huge difference for REPRO because the default
CISZ for VSAM is 18K or 26K, and a large BUFND would not make a large
difference in elapsed time on a small to medium size dataset.

Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of
> Yifat Oren
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 4:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] DFSMS and System Managed Buffering
> 
> Tobias,
> 
> The reason you are not seeing the expected savings is that the IDCAMS
REPRO
> has already set and used the optimal number of data buffers regardless of
> the DATACLAS change (so, no change has actually taken place; optimal
> buffering was used for both before and after runs).
> 
> You should see the savings when programs that are not taking care of their
> VSAM buffering start using these data sets.
> 
> I too think that 1MB is a bit constrictive for direct access LSR (bias=do)
> buffering.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yifat
> 
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to