-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of gsg Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Initiators
Is there any reason why you shouldn't have alot of initiators defined, but have alot of them drained. Is there any performance considerations? Thanks <SNIPPAGE> Each initiator, drained or running, takes up room in the SQA for ASCBs and such. Other than that, there is some storage taken within JES2 (or JES3). That's about the only real overhead I can think of for excess, but drained, INITS. Later, Steve Thompson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
