Did you verify your CUADDR's are correct?  I've seen an instance where
the CUADDR was wrong and it brought up the same VOLUME on two UCB's.  

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 8:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Duplicate Volser

But if this did indeed happen as described, you haven't answered the 
basic question about how this could have been allowed by MVS.  MVS is 
not supposed to allow two volumes with the same volser online at the 
same time, as a volser is supposed to be a unique identifier of an 
online physical volume.  It makes no difference if both are shared and 
accessible at IPl time. If two identical volsers are found that should 
be online, I have never seen a case where MVS did not complain and ask 
which of the two should be placed offline before allowing the MVS start 
up to proceed.  Somehow MVS would have to be convinced that both were 
the same physical device, which would require something really bizarre, 
like MVS thinking the address of one was a PAV alias address for the 
other, and information received from the DASD subsystem ought to 
preclude that from happening.
   Joel C Ewing

On 10/04/2010 07:22 AM, Richbourg, Claude wrote:
> Check your IODF definition and see if the volumes are defined as
> 'Shared' and set to come online at IPL time.
> If so, when you vary them offline before an IPL, they will come online
> at IPL time. You may need to search for DASD volumes that are only
> accessible from the LPAR you wish them to be on. BTDT and it will make
> your hair gray.
>
> Hope that Helps,
> Claude
>
> --Snip --
>
> I am posting to the list, while I go search IBM for the cause and/or
> answer, in
> case someone has the answer already.  Upgraded to z/OS V1.11 on new
> 2098-
> K02, with new IBM DS6800 dasd array.  Have been testing on Test LPAR
> since
> May.  Night of actual cutover to new machine, did IPL, started
> everything and
> it all went mostly well (will not discuss testing protocol here).  Did
> IPL
> Saturday night and things have been hosed up since.  Lots of wierd
> little
> problems, all related to datasets on disk.  Got called tonight, apps
> group
> unable to resolve issue.  I start looking and find one of my
production
> volumes
> online.  Only problem, I find the Test LPAR version of this same
volume
> online
> too.  They have the same volser.  I have been back through the log,
> looking
> at all of the IPL messages, nothing related to duplicate volser (which
I
> am
> used to).  Thanks in advance for your help.
> Steve
>


-- 
Joel C. Ewing, Fort Smith, AR        [email protected]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to