Thanks to all who contributed to this. IBM posted this on the PMR:
The diagnostic phase is complete. We have opened APAR OA34546 to
prevent the result of the sequence of events. If you like, please visit
IBMLINK to recieve notification of the APAR's progress. Let me know if
you would like to close the PMR out at this time.
Steve
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:14:05 -0400, Pinnacle
<[email protected]> wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jim Mulder" <[email protected]>
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
>Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:51 PM
>Subject: Re: Duplicate Volser
>
>
>>> Rick, this indeed was before we had consoles. Same general time as if
>> you
>>> had PROMPT turned on. I included the last bit of detail in my
>>> original problem
>>> with IBM, which is what prompted me to go back and reread my original
>> post.
>>> The bad thing is IBM told me they did not think they could work on this
>>> without the original syslog. I would think my timeline, plus the
>>> deallocation
>>> from the FDR job would be enough. We shall see.
>>
>> I have examined the relevant code, and it appears to (incorrectly)
>> do exactly as you have described. I have updated your PMR.
>>
>> Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY
>
>Jim,
>
>Now that we can actually do this, do you need a requirement so we can get
it
>officially supported?
>
>Regards,
>Tom Conley
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
