On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:40:42 +0200, R.S. wrote: >W dniu 2010-10-12 23:17, Thomas Kern pisze: >> Not just use the strongest, but you have to go out of your way to reject >> using the "low" and "medium" strength ciphers. My cyber security people >> complain about anything that is 112 bits or less. > >It's not so far from the strongest. >BTW, rhetorical: Did your security people justified why 112 bits is bad? >Provided any reason excpet "the stronger is the better"? Maybe some >airline magazine article? <vbg> > Isn't 112 bits the key space of Triple DES with keying option 2?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
