On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:38:50 -0800, Ray Mullins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>And z/OS isn't the only IBM mainframe operating system, and IBM isn't the
>only mainframe player either (although it probably is in the high 90s
>percentile of installed base).  Unisys, Groupe Bull, Fujitsu Hitachi and
>Fujitsu-Siemens have mainframe-class hardware and OSes, too.  HP might be
>included, depending on how you consider the soon-to-be-gone HP3000/MPE and
>the former DEC hardware/OpenVMS.  (Paul, does STK ^W Sun support its
>products with those other boxes?)
>
Sure.  I'll let the WWW speak for us:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=storagetek+%22open+systems%22

>Now if "we" can just make Java run better on z/Architecture.  :-D
>
Is it z/Architecture, or z/OS?  How's Java for Linux for z/Series?
(Is it even available?  See -- we're not quite Solarized yet.)  Is
the stumbling block EBCDIC (which certainly causes enough problems)?
Or the z/OS load module/DLL structure?  Or LE?

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to