On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:54:24 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:52:00 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote: > >>block size of 512 uses less than 1% of a track on a 3390. 4K >>uses 86%, which is tolerable. > >A single 512 byte block on a 3390 uses less than 1% of the 56,664 >byte capacity of the track. > >Twelve 4096 byte blocks (the most that will fit on a 3390 track) uses >86.7% of the track capacity. > Sounds like a biased comparison to me.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
