Hi Kees, 3 physical CPs 2 Prod LPARs each with 3 LPs 1 Test LPAR with 2 LPs 1 Sandbox with 1 LP
So we have 9 LPs competing for 3 CPs. Fortunately 3 of those LPs are little used. The relative weights of the Prod LPARs are 45 and 30. The LPAR reporting the problem is the one with 30, no surprise there. The Test LPAR has a weight of 15 while the Sandbox has a weight of 10 and seldom use their relative share. I have suggested that a 2:1 LP to CP ratio would be more efficient but was told the faster CP make the 2:1 ratio obsolete. Makes no sense to me but then I'm the DASD guy. Every problem is HSM until proven otherwise. Thank You, Dave O'Brien NIH Contractor ________________________________________ From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM [kees.verno...@klm.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Question concerning CMF reporting of CPU Delay "O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT" <obrie...@mail.nih.gov> wrote in message news:<cd22aa1aee707d489d9250d13e3862a18593711...@nihmlbxcms02.nih.gov>.. . > We had a situation where our M204 users reported a delay but CMF shows the main delay as CPU but at a relatively low %. > > Question - Does CMF only report CPU delay for the Logical Processors in that particular LPAR? > The LPAR is question often shows CPU usage of 90+%, while the CMF LPARSTAR view shows a physical cpu% of 35-45%. > > Is it possible that the delay at the Physical processor is not reported, or reported in a different view? > > Thank You, > Dave O'Brien > NIH Contractor > How many logical processors does the Lpar have and how many physical processors does the machine have? If this ratio is 1:2, 90% lpar utilization means 45% machine utilization. Kees. ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
