I had a similar requirement a few months back because for some reason, they 
have NJE locked up real tight around here.

I created a rexx routine that basically ftps the spool file to the intended 
lpar 
by ip address.

I initiate the process by performing an SE on the spool entry and then typing 
the Edit Macro/REXX at the command line.  For lack of creativity, I called my 
script LPR and follow it by the destination name of the lpar such as PROD, 
DEV, QA etc. The esoteric name then gets converted by the rexx to the ip 
address of the lpar and I can ftp to the same lpar where the command was 
initiated if needed.

I place a jcl skeleton (iebgener) and spool data into an mvs file 
(RECFM=VBA,LRECL=300,BLKSIZE=27900) 
and then FTP the file to the desired lpar to create the new spool entry.

QUOTE SITE FILETYP=JES
MODE B
TYPE E
QUOTE SITE JESLRECL=254
PUT '||"'"FIL2FTP"'"    

Although it is not fully automated and the original characteristics of the 
spool 
entry are not kept, it has worked fine for all intents and purposes.
I'm positive there is much room for improvement but my only requirement was 
to be able to print a report/sysout for programmers from lpars that do not 
have printers set up so it works just fine for me.  Offloading to a spool 
offload 
dataset and then reloading was too cumbersome so this was much easier.



On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:09:03 -0500, Jousma, David 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>All,
>
>Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using
>NJE.    Issue is transferring output between two different MAS-plex of
>the same node-name.  NJE would work if multi-hopped, NODE-A connected to
>NODE-B, NODE-B connected to NODE-C, and finally NODE-C connects to the
>other NODE-A, but that is too many hops in my opinion.  
>
>Looking for other creative, supportable methods to solve this.   Already
>thinking about:
>
>-      Automated spool offload to dataset, FTP to remote site, spool
>reload
>-      ??
>
>Assumptions:
>
>-      Maintain print characteristics
>-      both spools have the same node name, that's why is not the first
>option
>-      cannot change node name due to external customer connections
>-      existing external connections are using Enterprise Extender, and
>the IP's of the separate hosts ARE different, so no conflict externally.
>
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Dave Jousma
>Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
>[email protected]
>1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB1G
>p 616.653.8429
>f 616.653.8497
>
>
>This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.
>It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-
mail in error,
>please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner.  If you are not the 
intended 
>recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of 
>this 
information
>is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the 
sender that the 
>message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer 
system. Your 
>assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to