>Of course it's not all due to a lot of executable code. It's much more complex than that. Like most things in life, there are mixtures of causes.
>Changing CICS is going to take a lot of time and effort, and some work has obviously already been done. I personally believe the priority of 64-bit exploitation >should have been much higher, but I'm certain the development team has pressure on it from lots of source. Unfortunately, the problem is that even if IBM were to provide this capability, the likelihood is that the overwhelming majority of customers wouldn't use it. Even in the example you cited, if this were available tomorrow, I would bet that there would be no project on the schedule to begin exploiting the feature and the customer would continue to run 800 regions. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
