In FILEL an /SD command will sort by descending date.

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's been a long time since I used CMS, but what happens if you issue the
> same sort command a second time?
>
> There is a VM-specific mailing list I think, but someone here should know
> the answer.
>
> Charles
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf
> Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 7:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: CMS Sort Descending?
>
> Group,
>
>   We maintain the SYSTEM CONFIG on z/VM using an exec that renames the
> members.  I need to run this exec on the oldest file first.  If I could
> sort
> FLIST/LISTF in descending date order I would be able to process the files
> in
> order from top to bottom.  I looked at FLIST and found:" If the SORT
> options
> are specified when the FLIST command is issued, users should invoke their
> own sort routines while within the FLIST environent.  The exec specified on
> the SORT option will be given control when the user issues a sort
> subcommand
> (/Sn) from the FLIST screen."  I didn't find anything for LISTF/FILEL in
> regards to using a sort exec.
>
> Q). In reviewing the CMS SORT command I don't see an option to override the
> default sort order (ascending EBCDIC order).  Is there a way to sort on an
> FLIST field in descending EBCDIC order?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>



-- 
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to