>> If neither LLA nor XCFAS have their hands on old.linklib, you can >> delete the dataset.
> No. You can do a SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE to free the ENQ that > XCFAS has and you can either stop LLA or otherwise get it to release > the old.linklib data set. That does *NOT* mean that it is save to > delete the data set. That does nothing to remove it from use as a > LNKLST data set. I agree 100%. I didn't say it is safe, I only said "you can delete it", because neither LLA not XCFAS use/ENQue it. > In order to make it inactive as a LNKLST data set, a new LNKLST set > must be activated and all running address spaces that started before > activating the new LNKLST set must be told to use the new LNKLST > set using LNKLST UPDATE. This is somewhat dangerous and should > only be done if you are prepared to IPL. I agree 100%. So If I were the OP, I would activate a new LNKLST01 (as he did) and leave old.linklib where it is. Walter Marguccio z/OS Systems Programmer BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH Munich - Germany ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
