In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/22/2005
at 07:34 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>How did they rationalize ignoring the customers who, to avoid catalog
>proliferation, assign multiple TSO User IDs to a single HLQ?
What customers? That's a mode of operation that IBM never supported.
I've done local mods to allow it, but it gets ugly, due to OCO.
>Such rejections can be reversed.
Be my guest. I can't do anything as long as I'm unemployed, and even
when I get a new job there's no guaranty that it will be with a SHARE
member, much less a SHARE member that has the requirement. I don't
recall the requirement number, but it was in the 1990's.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
