"Capping" works fine for us....
-jc-
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Dummy LPAR to store excess MIPS
>
> Dick,
>
> We've been doing this for a number of months. We have a 2094-704 that
we
> dedicated one CPU to our sysprog lpar (so we didn't need to create a
> parking lpar). It seems to be working to hold down the costs on the
> other production lpars.
>
> Alan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Bond, Dick (DIS)
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 16:58
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Dummy LPAR to store excess MIPS
>
> Does anyone use the concept of a "dummy" LPAR to store excess "MIPS"
to
> avoid software costs?
>
> Suggest other methods of storing unused capacity?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dick Bond
> Department of Information Services
> CSD Production Support
> [email protected]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
