In <listserv%[email protected]>, on 04/10/2011
   at 11:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:

>"effect"?

I can't type or answer the phone.

>Rather:

There were two parts. One was, as you noted, incorrect; stem.= does
indeed drop existing values. However, the part about stem.0 is
correct; it does not affect any other compound variables, does not
create an array[1] and does not limit what tails you can use for other
compound variables with the same stem.

[1] Rexx, unlike OREXX, has no arrays. 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to