Ted, Yes. I did.
Would it have been more appropriate if I added that dyadic processors required revision of many of the methods that we applied to earlier models. Would you use a capacity planning methodology for a 3033 AP when you model a 3090-200? Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] CPU utilization/forecasting > > >There may well be, but I've only been reading them for the last twenty five > years myself. For my niche, most work prior to MVS/XA was updated soon after > its introduction because of the changes to IO path queuing and measurement > that XA ushered in around the time I started down this path. > > Now, you've diverged. > You've moved from CPU to IO. > > - > Ted MacNEIL > [email protected] > Twitter: @TedMacNEIL > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
