As long as that sandbox doesn't share anything with any production system maybe.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Gerhard Postpischil <[email protected]>wrote: > On 4/22/2011 4:17 PM, Rob Schramm wrote: > >> Super Secret (aka Security Through Obscurity) is always a bad idea. >> Security and integrity are difficult enough when balanced against >> allowing >> progress to occur. Adding in ridiculously risky back doors into your >> system >> is a recipe for disaster. >> > > I take issue with "always", as a special SVC on a sandbox system may save > significant time debugging and writing new software, while presenting > minimal exposure. > > Gerhard Postpischil > Bradford, VT > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this material in error and that any forwarding, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of the material is strictly prohibited. If you have received this material in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the material. Emails are not secure and can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by email. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
