*Exactly!  *This is the correct way of doing RSU**** maintenance upgrades.
It also solves some of the objections to the way RESTORE works as well.
There are those who say they never ACCEPT maintenance which will cause a lot
of problems which is then attributed to poor SMP/E design.   SMP/E is the
best thing since bacon-and-eggs if used properly.

For the SMPPTS, I generally predefine 4-5 of them which works well for me
but each shop is unique.

Thanks.

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Linda Mooney <[email protected]>wrote:

> As can be seen from the replies, there are different approaches for
> handling the PTS.  In my shop, when a z/OS release is installed, the PTS is
> placed on a volume where it will have plenty of room.  For the life of the
> install, PTFs are not purged from the PTS - ever.  If necessary, spill PTS
> datasets are defined.  We are not a large shop, and this works for us.
>
>
>
> *For ACCEPT, we generally run the ACCEPT of previous service just before
> beginning the next maintenance cycle.
> *
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Linda
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Zelden" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 7:45:39 AM
> Subject: Re: SMPPTS run out of Space (another approach)
>
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:25:36 +0200, R.S. <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >W dniu 2011-04-29 15:18, Mark Zelden pisze:
> >> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:30:59 +0530, saurabh khandelwal
> >> <[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>             Thanks for reply. I will check in my site about old PTF,
> >>> which can be removed from PTS library and detail about accepted PTFs.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Saurabh
> >>>
> >>
> >>>> Caution: SMP/E option PURGE(YES) is needed for the above. PURGE(NO)
> >>>> means the PTF is not deleted after ACCEPT.
> >>>>
> >>>> In simpler words: if you accept old PTFs then you don't need more PTS
> >>>> space for new PTFs.
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> What R.S. didn't tell you was what to do if PURGE(NO) is specified.   I
> have
> >> to run that way at one of my clients because while I maintain a single
> >> global zone / SMPPTS, I have multiple target zones for different
> >> companies within that shop  (multiple per company to match
> >> the sysres set) and a single DLIB zone for each company.   I can't clean
> >> up the SMPPTS until ACCEPT is done in all the DLIB zones (otherwise
> >> the 2nd and subsequent ACCEPTs get very angry when the sysmod is
> >> gone from the global zone / SMPPTS!) .
> >>
> >> What you have to do is run REJECT in PURGE mode.   Simple enough:
> >>
> >>    SET    BOUNDARY (GLOBAL).
> >>    REJECT PURGE  (DLIB1,DLIB2,DLIB3,...).
> >>
> >> After I do that, I run CLEANUP against the maintenance target zones
> >> and compress the SMPPTS(es).
> >
> >Mark,
> >I also have multiple DLIB and TARGET zones. My way to clean up PTS is to
> >switch PURGE OFF, then perform ACCPET on every DLIB *except* last one,
> >switch PURGE ON (YES) and then perform ACCEPT on the last one. It's
> >error-prone ;-)
>
> Even if not error prone, seems like more work to me than it's worth.
>
> Also, for me,  the different companies / business units don't always
> have the same schedules to roll out maintenance.  So company A could be
> at RSU1009 and company B at RSU1012 and since I won't except anything
> that isn't at least 6 months old, the DLIB zones could be at different
> accept levels also.
>
> >
> >I have a question to the command above: REJECT PURGE(DLIB1,DLIB2,...)
> >Is AND or OR between the zones? In other words: PTF accepted on every
> >DLIB will be purged, what about PTF accepted on single DLIB?
> >
>
> I should tell you to RTFM, but I like you.  :-)
>
> It means to "consider all the specified zones when doing the REJECT" - so
> it
> is an "AND" condition.   If only one zone was specified, it would only look
> at that one zone and could delete a PTF from the global zone that was not
> yet accepted into the other DLIB zone(s) being maintained.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
> mailto:[email protected]
> Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
> Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
>
> *** Please note the new URL for Mark's MVS Utilities ***
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to