Dave, But doesn't everything WAC? (I presume you mean Works As Coded). :-)
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: DCBs and DCBEs - Could IBM have done it any worse? At 6/8/2011 04:25 PM, Scott Rowe wrote: >Dave, > >I was happy to see that you are only "barking: at the hand that feeds you >;-) > >Have you opened a PMR with IBM on this to see if it is WAD? Well, it's certainly WAC... For reason's I cannot get into, I am unable to open PMRs... Maybe my rant will move someone else to do so. In any case, I've got my workaround, and now you do too... Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html The information contained in this e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and that you will be held responsible for any such unauthorized activity, including liability for any resulting damages. As appropriate, such incident(s) may also be reported to law enforcement. If you received this e-mail in error, please reply to sender and destroy or delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
